What is to be accomplished by fundamentalism? What is its purpose? Why does it propagate itself?  First, it should be noted that I am not referring to what some baby-boomer Christian might mean by “fundamentalism” (i.e. something like “sticking to the basics of the faith”).  I am referring to the term as used in current discussions of world affairs. 

It is on the forefront of the world stage now. We see in it both religion and politics. In America these are combined in the radical religious right. In the Middle East they are combined in so-called “Islamic” terrorism.

What is fundamentalism? Jimmy Carter characterized fundamentalism beautifully1 as:

  • “Almost invariably… led by authoritarian males who consider themselves to be superior to others…”
  • “Fundamentalists draw clear distinction between themselves, as true believers, and others, convinced that they are right and anyone who contradicts them is ignorant and possibly evil.”
  • “Fundamentalists tend to make their self-definition increasingly narrow and restricted, to isolate themselves, to demagogue emotional issues, and to view change, cooperation, negotiation, and other efforts to resolves differences as signs of weakness.”

The three words he chose to summarize these characteristics were: “rigidity, domination and exclusion”.

What is interesting is fundamentalism is like a virus. It cannot thrive on its own. Fundamentalism can only exist and be propagated through a host philosophy. There can be no fundamentalist Christians without Christianity already being there. This follows C.S. Lewis’s characterization of “Evil” in Mere Christianity2. Evil is a perversion of good. “Lying” cannot be defined without first knowing what “speaking truthfully” is. The nature of lying is a parasitic upon the nature of speaking truthfully. Fundamentalism is parasitic upon its underlying philosophy. It has no intrinsic value. Shouldn’t that vacuous nature of fundamentalism give us pause to take up its causes wherever we find them?

What is to be gained by fundamentalism, then? To be sure, an erroneous sense of certainty and, from that, a deceptive sense of fulfillment. If one is right then what remains to be explored? If one is right then what need is there to challenge one’s self?

We see it at play in American politics. Although on the rise for a long time, the past five years (2001-2006) have seen an unprecedented rise of fundamentalism. We see the traits of it as politicians, more and more, “toeing the party line”.

A republic is supposed to work as follows: a group of people to elect a person who represent their values and philosophies. The representatives from all walks of life come to together to enact policy to serve the greater good. This is a noble idea.

But fundamentalism creeps in and the idea that differing ideologies should collaborate to serve the greater good is lost. What remains, and what we see at play in politics now, is to focus on the difference in ideologies and to hold that one set is right and all others are wrong.

Do we not see the same thing in the increasingly sectarian behavior of the Christian church? What of Islam? We have seen what the benefit of fundamentalism is. But what are the costs?

Many things are sacrificed in order to bring about that sense of certainty and fulfillment that fundamentalism brings. We sacrifice wisdom – and we gain rhetoric. We sacrifice peace – and we gain conflict. We sacrifice the pursuit of truth – and we gain dogmatism. Truly, then, fundamentalism will construct elaborate prisons for our minds. For the sake of our friends, for the sake of our families, for the sake of the future; we must break free.

References:

1Our Endangered Values, pp34-35, Simon & Schuster, 2005

2Mere Christianity, pp 43-44 (Book II, Chapter ), Harper Collins, 2001

2 Responses to “Fundamentalism”

  1. steve Says:

    i like your views…


  2. Amazing! It is freaky how on-topic, how relevant a couple of your posts are to the two articles I happen to be writing at the moment. I was a little disappointed to see that you are an Evangelical Christian – not because it’s bad, but because, for a moment, I thought I’d found another person who actually agrees with me!🙂

    Do you consider yourself still searching, or having found? I hope I never cease my spiritual search and that there will always be room for more!

    I won’t say this in my blog, as I try to maintain a positive tone — but I am staunchly ANTI-FUNDIE. I was raised in the church of Christ, went to private Christian school 1st grade thru college, etc. After atheism, buddhism, deism, pantheism, etc., I finally hovered in freethought (NOT the atheistic flavor) for a significant period and I remain there today.

    I hope to hear from you and that you will eventually return to writing and seeking (if you ever left).

    take care
    Stephen

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s